Here's a common way it goes wrong. A grounds-maintenance solicitation, multi-year, straightforward-looking work.

Download it, and it runs eighty-some pages with a stack of attachments: wage determination, site map, a past performance form, a pricing workbook with tabs nobody's opened yet.

It gets read front to back, the way most documents do.

The evaluation section, near the end, is where the award turns out to hinge mostly on past performance: three references, similar size and scope, last three years. Whatever time went into the scope of work first ends up answering a question that hadn't even come up yet.

The fix is simple. Stop reading it in order.

Know which format you're holding before anything else

There are two shapes these come in and they don't look alike. Reading a solicitation cover to cover only half works if you don't know which one you've got.

The first is the uniform contract format. Four parts, lettered sections A through M: Schedule is A through H, contract clauses are I, the attachment list is J, and then K, L and M are the representations and instructions (FAR 15.204-1, Table 15-1).

Part IV doesn't survive the award, a detail that's easy to miss. Solicitations include all four parts, but on award the contracting officer "shall not physically include Part IV in the resulting contract" and keeps it in the file (15.204-1(b)). The sections that told you how you'd be judged aren't in the contract you sign.

And plenty of things don't use the format at all. It need not be used for construction and architect-engineer contracts, subsistence contracts, contracts requiring special formats prescribed elsewhere, letter requests for proposals, or anything the agency head exempts (FAR 15.204).

The second shape is commercial. Those get assembled around Standard Form 1449, with the terms at 52.212-4, the statute-and-executive-order clause at 52.212-5, the instructions at 52.212-1, and evaluation at 52.212-2 (FAR 12.303).

No lettered sections in that one. If you go looking for Section M and there isn't one, you're holding the commercial kind.

How to read an RFP backward, starting with the evaluation

Section M is where the contracting officer identifies every significant factor and subfactor that gets considered in awarding, and their relative importance (FAR 15.204-5(c)).

That's the question. Everything else is you answering it.

The rule behind it says all factors and significant subfactors that will affect award and their relative importance "shall be stated clearly in the solicitation," and the general approach for evaluating past performance has to be described (FAR 15.304(d)).

That same sentence has a line worth catching early. "The rating method need not be disclosed in the solicitation."

So you get the factors and their order, not the scoring sheet. Trying to reverse-engineer points out of the wording is a dead end; there's nothing there to find.

There's another sentence in nearly every one of these that people skim past. The solicitation has to say whether all the factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than price, approximately equal to it, or significantly less important (15.304(e)).

Three options, one of them picked, usually one line long. That's how you find out whether you're in a price fight.

Two more provisions matter here. Quality gets addressed in every source selection through non-cost factors, the listed examples including past performance, compliance with solicitation requirements, technical excellence and management capability (15.304(c)(2)). And past performance shall be evaluated in negotiated competitive acquisitions expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, unless the contracting officer documents why it isn't appropriate here (15.304(c)(3)).

Past performance isn't hiding at the back. It's close to standard.

Section L is the shape of the answer

After M, go to L.

Section L is where the contracting officer puts the instructions and notices not required elsewhere, to guide you in preparing the proposal. You may be told to submit in a specific format or in severable parts, broken out as administrative, management, technical, past performance and cost (FAR 15.204-5(b)).

M is what gets graded. L is the box they want it packed in. Do those backward and a decent bid gets tossed on format, which is a bad way to lose.

How to read an RFP that doesn't have a Section M

Commercial ones put the same information in a provision instead of a section.

Under 52.212-2, award goes to the responsible offeror whose conforming offer "will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered." The contracting officer fills in the factors in relative order of importance, then completes the sentence "Technical and past performance, when combined, are ____" (FAR 52.212-2).

Fill-in-the-blank. Same content as Section M, a page long instead of eight.

Read paragraph (b) of that provision before you price anything. The Government evaluates by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement, and may find an offer unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluating the options doesn't obligate anybody to exercise them.

The year-four rate is in the award decision whether or not year four happens, and it's easy to treat option years as a maybe when they're not.

One caution. 12.303 lists 52.212-2 "or other description of evaluation factors for award, if used." So the evaluation might be in an addendum instead, worth checking for even when the provision list looks short.

When two parts of the same document disagree

This is the one that's easy to overlook entirely. It's called the order of precedence, and there's a version of it in nearly everything you'll open.

If there's an inconsistency in a uniform-format solicitation, it gets resolved in a set order: the Schedule (excluding the specifications), then representations and other instructions, then contract clauses, then other documents and attachments, and the specifications last (FAR 52.215-8).

Commercial has its own nine-item version at 52.212-4(s), ending the same way. Standard Form 1449 is seventh, other documents and attachments eighth, "the specification" ninth.

Both formats rank the spec dead last. A technical attachment that an entire estimate was built from still loses to the schedule if the two ever disagree.

A reading order that holds up

Evaluation first, whichever form it's in. Then the instructions, then the scope, then price. Reading a solicitation in that order takes longer in the first hour and a lot less by the end.

A two-column list while reading helps. Left column is every "shall submit" out of L, right column is every factor out of M. Anything sitting in one column with nothing across from it belongs in the questions sent to the contracting officer.

The five-minute triage is still a separate pass, and it comes first: the fields worth checking to kill a bad fit fast are covered in how to read a SAM.gov solicitation. This is the read that follows, once a solicitation survives that first pass.

And re-checking the document against the amendments before submitting matters too, for reasons covered in how to find government contracts on a schedule.

How much weight "compliance with solicitation requirements" carries against technical excellence is rarely spelled out. That's the rating method, and the government doesn't have to disclose it.

If you already have a UEI, the free check below shows the gaps in your SAM.gov registration.

See your registration gaps in one check

The free Autopsy reads the public SAM.gov record for your UEI and gives you a Readiness Score. The full analysis shows the registration gaps it finds and who wins work under your NAICS codes, where records exist. No account, no card.

Run your free Autopsy →

You'll need your UEI.

Sources